ZLD System Cost Comparison: Thermal vs Non-Thermal Evaporation

Choosing a Zero Liquid Discharge (ZLD) system is a major capital decision. This guide compares the two main evaporation technologies to help you make an informed choice.

Two Main Evaporation Technologies

1. Thermal Evaporation

Uses heat to vaporize water. Includes:

2. Non-Thermal Evaporation

Uses mechanical atomization + natural evaporation:

Cost Comparison Table

ParameterThermal (MVR)Non-Thermal
CAPEEX₹2-10 crore₹50 lakh - 2 crore
Power Consumption80-150 kWh/m³15-30 kWh/m³
Operating Cost₹80-150/m³₹15-35/m³
Steam RequiredYesNo
MaintenanceHigh (compressors)Low (pumps, fans)
FootprintCompactLarge
Startup Time30-60 min5-10 min

5-Year Total Cost of Ownership

For a typical 100 m³/day system:

Cost ComponentThermal (MVR)Non-Thermal
CAPEEX₹5 crore₹1 crore
5-Year OPEX₹1.5 crore₹0.4 crore
5-Year Maintenance₹50 lakh₹15 lakh
Total 5-Year Cost₹7 crore₹1.55 crore

Savings with Non-Thermal: 78% lower total cost!

When to Choose Thermal

When to Choose Non-Thermal

Real-World Example: Chemical Industry, Gujarat

Client: Specialty chemicals manufacturer, Vatwa

Volume: 50 m³/day RO reject, TDS 12,000

Thermal MVRNon-Thermal
System Cost₹3.5 crore₹75 lakh
Annual Operating₹45 lakh₹12 lakh
ROI Period5 years1.5 years

Client chose: Non-thermal (Asiatic Engineers system)

Result: 18-month payback, ₹33 lakh annual savings

Conclusion

For most Indian industries, non-thermal evaporation offers superior economics. The 60-70% lower operating costs translate to faster ROI and lower total cost of ownership. Thermal systems make sense only in specific high-volume, continuous-operation scenarios.

Get a cost estimate for your facility: Contact Asiatic Engineers +91 98240 54002